Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D1-P / Spain / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea |
| Reported by | Subdirección General para la Protección del Mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister |
| Report date | 2020-02-03 |
| Report access | msfd2018-ART10.XML |
Target code |
00 |
00 |
A. E.12 |
A. L.12 |
A.1.1 |
A.1.1 |
A.1.2 |
A.1.2 |
A.1.3 |
A.1.3 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.5 |
A.1.5 |
A.1.6 |
A.1.6 |
A.1.7 |
A.1.7 |
A.1.8 |
A.1.8 |
A.1.9 |
A.1.9 |
A.2.1 |
A.2.1 |
A.2.2 |
A.2.2 |
A.3.1 |
A.3.1 |
A.3.2 |
A.3.2 |
A.3.3 |
A.3.3 |
A.3.3 |
A.3.3 |
A.3.4 |
A.3.4 |
A.3.4 |
A.3.4 |
A.3.5 |
A.3.5 |
A.3.6 |
A.3.6 |
A.E.1 |
A.E.10 |
A.E.11 |
A.E.2 |
A.E.3. |
A.E.4 |
A.E.5 |
A.E.6 |
A.E.7 |
A.E.8 |
A.E.9 |
A.L.1 |
A.L.10 |
A.L.11 |
A.L.2 |
A.L.3. |
A.L.4 |
A.L.5 |
A.L.6 |
A.L.7 |
A.L.8 |
A.L.9 |
B.E.17 |
B.L.14 |
B.L.17 |
C.1.1 |
C.1.1 |
C.1.2 |
C.1.2 |
C.1.3 |
C.1.3 |
C.1.4 |
C.1.4 |
C.1.5 |
C.1.5 |
C.1.6 |
C.1.6 |
C.2.1 |
C.2.1 |
C.2.2 |
C.2.2 |
C.2.3 |
C.2.3 |
C.3.1 |
C.3.1 |
C.3.2 |
C.3.2 |
C.3.3 |
C.3.3 |
C.3.4 |
C.3.4 |
C.3.5 |
C.3.5 |
C.3.7 |
C.3.7 |
C.3.8 |
C.3.8 |
C.3.9 |
C.3.9 |
C.E.1 |
C.E.10 |
C.E.11 |
C.E.12 |
C.E.15 |
C.E.16 |
C.E.17 |
C.E.18 |
C.E.19 |
C.E.2 |
C.E.4 |
C.E.5 |
C.E.6 |
C.E.7 |
C.E.8 |
C.E.9 |
C.L.1 |
C.L.10 |
C.L.11 |
C.L.12 |
C.L.15 |
C.L.16 |
C.L.17 |
C.L.18 |
C.L.19 |
C.L.2 |
C.L.4 |
C.L.5 |
C.L.6 |
C.L.7 |
C.L.8 |
C.L.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Achieve or maintain the values and characteristics defined as GES for all descriptors of good environmental status at the boundary of the Strait and Alboran Sea.
|
Achieve or maintain the values and characteristics defined as GES for all descriptors of good environmental status in the Levantino-Balearic demarcation.
|
Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
* Proportion of the assessment area studied.
* Proportion of coastal habitats studied.
* Proportion of deep habitats studied.
OBJECTIVES 2012: C.3.2, C.3.3, C.3.4.
|
Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
* Proportion of the assessment area studied.
* Proportion of coastal habitats studied.
* Proportion of deep habitats studied.
OBJECTIVES 2012: C.3.2, C.3.3, C.3.4.
|
And avoiding adverse effects of the exploitation of marine non-renewable resources on biogenic or protected habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.1.Reducing the intensity and area of influence of the significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with particular attention to protected habitats or natural interest.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To prevent or reduce anchoring of the substandard rock habitats and sea bed and grassland habitats
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-indigenous species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation (avoid leakages in aquaculture or aquarium installations, avoid transport and release into the medium of species associated with those cultivated outside their natural range, ballast water control, control of live bait, sediment discharge control, anchoring or cleaning of helmets).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.2. Minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
anthropogenic translocation of translocation
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Eradicate or decrease, preferably in the early stages of invasive procedures, the abundance of invasive species to ease pressure on the habitat, in cases where the economic or biodiversity loss is significant, and provided that it is technically feasible and there is no collateral damage.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.9 Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the D2 DMESAL initial assessment, including the development of early warning networks and their coordination at national level.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.9. Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the initial evaluation of D2 in
DMLEBA, (blue crab Callinectes sapidus, macrophytes algae or cidia Aplidium accarense), including the development of detection networks
early and their coordination at national level.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, destruction of habitats and overfishing.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.3. Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease
groups of non-commercial species at the top of the chain
trophic (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, elasmobranchs)
pelagic and demersal).
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, marine birds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, habitat destruction and overweighing. in the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.3. Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease
groups of non-commercial species at the top of the chain
trophic (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, elasmobranchs)
pelagic and demersal)
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, destruction of habitats and overfishing.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.3. Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease
groups of non-commercial species at the top of the chain
trophic (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, elasmobranchs)
pelagic and demersal).
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, marine birds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, habitat destruction and overweighing. in the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.3. Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease
groups of non-commercial species at the top of the chain
trophic (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, elasmobranchs)
pelagic and demersal)
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, destruction of habitats and overfishing.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.3. Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease
groups of non-commercial species at the top of the chain
trophic (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, elasmobranchs)
pelagic and demersal).
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, marine birds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, pollution, habitat destruction and overweighing. in the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.3. Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease
groups of non-commercial species at the top of the chain
trophic (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, elasmobranchs)
pelagic and demersal)
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
In the second cycle, the objective has been maintained, although changing the code and indicators
C.E.5. To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and the code have changed.
|
To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species
In the second cycle, the objective has been maintained, although changing the code and indicators
C.L.5. To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, given that the code and the code have been changed.
|
Develop regulation to prevent commercial exploitation and by-catches of elasmobranchs included in the annexes of national legislation, European Directives or applicable international conventions.
|
Develop regulation to prevent commercial exploitation and by-catches of elasmobranchs included in the annexes of national legislation, European Directives or applicable international conventions.
|
Establish a national system for the coordination of programmes for the monitoring of incidental catches of seabirds, reptiles and marine mammals, reptiles and mammals and cabbage birds.
In the second cycle, this objective has been divided into two:
A.E.7 Improve national coordination and standardisation of habitat and species monitoring programmes
A.L.8. Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to accidental catches and bereavement events, including the monitoring of the incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds on fishing vessels.
Both will be reported as new because they have changed code and indicators
|
Establish a national system for the coordination of programmes for the monitoring of incidental catches of seabirds, reptiles and marine mammals, reptiles and mammals and cabbage birds.
In the second cycle, this objective has been divided into two:
A.L.7. Improve national coordination and standardisation of habitat and species monitoring programmes
A.L.8. Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to accidental catches and bereavement events, including the monitoring of the incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds on fishing vessels.
Both will be reported as new because they have changed code and indicators
|
Develop habitat restoration initiatives and habitat restoration initiatives where their deterioration would compromise the achievement of good environmental status of biodiversity descriptors.
This objective has become part of the new objective of the second cycle:
A.E.1 Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
that it will be reported as a new one
|
Develop habitat restoration initiatives and habitat restoration initiatives where their deterioration would compromise the achievement of good environmental status of biodiversity descriptors.
This objective has become part of the new objective of the second cycle:
A.L.1. Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
that it will be reported as a new one
|
Ensure adequate surveillance of the marine environment through remote or on-site systems.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.10 Ensuring regulatory compliance.
This modified objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensuring proper surveillance of the marine environment through remote or on-site systems
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.10. Ensuring regulatory compliance
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote the Network of Marine Protected Areas in Spain in the demarcation of the Strait and Alboran area, so as to adequately protect the biogenic habitats, protected habitats and other habitats identified in the initial assessment as being of particular interest, including a sufficient proportion of them and applying specific management measures.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.2. Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the Strait and Alboran area.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote the Network of Marine Protected Areas in Spain in the levantit Balearic district in order to adequately protect the biogenic habitats, protected habitats and other habitats identified in the initial assessment as being of particular interest, including a sufficient proportion of them and applying specific management measures.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.2.Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the South Atlantic area.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Completing the Natura 2000 network in the demarcation line of the Strait and Alborán area, by designating the IBAs, together with the IBAs, the proposal for new Sites of Community Importance and the drawing up and implementation of management plans ensuring that the values for which these sites are declared are preserved.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.1 Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Completing the Natura 2000 network in the levanno-Balear area, by designating the IBAs, the IBAs, the proposal for new Sites of Community Importance and the development and implementation of management plans to ensure the preservation of the values for which these sites are declared.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.1. Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To keep stable the size distribution of both demersal and demersal species and elasmobranchs and benthic species (according to the threshold established for the demarcation of the Strait and Alboran area in indicator 4.2.1. of the initial assessment) in the historical series of the scientific resource assessment campaigns, so that there is no downward trend between evaluation and evaluation.
|
To keep stable the size distribution of both demersal and demersal species and elasmobranchs and benthic species (according to the threshold size laid down for the levantno-Balear indicator in indicator 4.2.1. of the initial assessment) in the historical series of the scientific resource assessment campaigns, so that there is no downward trend between evaluation and evaluation.
|
To maintain the CSF (fish conservation status), calculated from the fish resource assessment surveys with fish considered large (according to the threshold established for the demarcation of the Strait and Alboran area in indicator 4.2.1. of the initial assessment), below 1, in the scale of vulnerability of the IUCN (0: Not vulnerable, 1: Vulnerable, 2: Threatened, 3: Threatened with extinction).
|
To maintain the CSF (fish conservation status), calculated from the fish resource assessment surveys with fish considered large (according to the threshold size laid down for the levantinon-state zone in indicator 4.2.1. of the initial assessment), below 1, in the scale of vulnerability of the IUCN (0: Not vulnerable, 1: Vulnerable, 2: Threatened, 3: Threatened with extinction).
|
Maintain the range of species distribution, so as not to be evidenced by decreases of the range in a number of species statistically unable to be considered as due to natural and climatic variability.
|
Maintain the range of species distribution, so as not to be evidenced by decreases of the range in a number of species statistically unable to be considered as due to natural and climatic variability.
|
Maintain the range of species distribution, so as not to be evidenced by decreases of the range in a number of species statistically unable to be considered as due to natural and climatic variability.
|
Maintain the range of species distribution, so as not to be evidenced by decreases of the range in a number of species statistically unable to be considered as due to natural and climatic variability.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in populations of key species and apical predators (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds and fish) and for commercially exploited species, to keep them within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.3 Maintain or restore the natural balance of the stocks of key species for the ecosystem.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in populations of key species and apical predators (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds and fish) and for commercially exploited species, to keep them within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.3. Maintain or restore the natural balance of the stocks of key species for the ecosystem.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in populations of key species and apical predators (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds and fish) and for commercially exploited species, to keep them within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.3 Maintain or restore the natural balance of the stocks of key species for the ecosystem.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in populations of key species and apical predators (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds and fish) and for commercially exploited species, to keep them within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.3. Maintain or restore the natural balance of the stocks of key species for the ecosystem.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the area of distribution of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and unique habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.4 To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the area of distribution of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and unique habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.4. To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Maintain the parameters and trends of state or condition descriptors of benthic communities (and their different facies and associations) within values to ensure their durability and performance, as well as the maintenance of their characteristic species, key and unique species.
|
Maintain the parameters and trends of state or condition descriptors of benthic communities (and their different facies and associations) within values to ensure their durability and performance, as well as the maintenance of their characteristic species, key and unique species.
|
Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
* Percentage of marine species/habitats not found or threatened, subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
* Percentage of the demarcation included in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), including RN2000.
* Percentage of the area of habitats of Community interest included in RN2000.
* Percentage of MPA with approved management plans and implementation.
Objectives 2012: A.1.8, A2.2
|
Ensuring regulatory compliance
* Estimation of surveillance in hours
* Infringements identified vs sanctions imposed
* Human resources available for monitoring and equipment available.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.9
|
Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to developing new indicators to assess and define Good Environmental Status.
There are adequate indicators to assess food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C. 3.8
|
Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areas in the Strait and Alboran area.
* Approval of the Master Plan for RAMPE.
* Percentage of MPAs included in the Spanish network of Marine Protected Areas.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.2.1
|
Maintain or restore the natural balance of populations of key species for the ecosystem
* Trends in populations of the species used as evaluation elements, corresponding to various trophic levels.
* Indicators used for the assessment of food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.3.4
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
* Trends in habitat distribution area.
Objective 2012: A3.5
|
Promoting the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study
* No. of marine species which are listed/delisted on lists and catalogues of threatened species, or change category.
* No. of target species.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.1
|
Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide-spread species (e.g. fish, cetaceans and reptiles).
* Number of international initiatives and working groups involved.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.2
|
Improve national coordination and standardisation of habitat and species monitoring programmes
* Existence of common methodologies/guides/protocols.
* No. of meetings for updating the monitoring programmes.
* Common access database for the various monitoring programmes.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.7
|
Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to accidental catches and mortality events, including the monitoring of the incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds on fishing vessels.
* Adoption and implementation of coordination systems at national level (protocols, common data collection templates, common methodologies, common database) to address monitoring and response to these events.
* Percentage of fleet involved in monitoring incidental catch (logbooks, specific actions...)
OBJECTIVE 2012: A1.7
|
Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the D2 DMESAL initial assessment, including the development of early warning networks and their coordination at national level.
The area covered by networks of detection and quantification of non-native species.
* Existence of action protocols for IAC screening events.
* Number of marine species categorised on the list of invasive alien species
* Percentage/number of invasive species subject to management measures or actions
* Percentage/number of habitats affected by invasive species which have been subject to management measures or actions
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.3, C.3.6
|
Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures
* Percentage of marine species/habitats not found or threatened, subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
* Percentage of the demarcation included in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), including RN2000.
* Percentage of the area of habitats of Community interest included in RN2000.
* Percentage of MPA with approved management plans and implementation.
Objectives 2012: A.1.8, A2.2
|
Ensuring regulatory compliance
* Estimation of surveillance in hours
* Infringements identified vs sanctions imposed
* Human resources available for monitoring and equipment available.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.9
|
Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to developing new indicators to assess and define Good Environmental Status.
There are adequate indicators to assess food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C. 3.8
|
Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well-managed network of marine protected areas in the Levantino-Balearic area.
* Approval of the Master Plan for RAMPE.
* Percentage of MPAs included in the Spanish network of Marine Protected Areas.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.2.1
|
Maintain or restore the natural balance of populations of key species for the ecosystem
* Trends in populations of the species used as evaluation elements, corresponding to various trophic levels.
* Indicators used for the assessment of food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.3.4
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
* Trends in habitat distribution area.
Objective 2012: A3.5
|
Promoting the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study
* No. of marine species which are listed/delisted on lists and catalogues of threatened species, or change category.
* No. of target species.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.1
|
Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide-spread species (e.g. fish, cetaceans and reptiles).
* Number of international initiatives and working groups involved.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.2
|
Improve national coordination and standardisation of habitat and species monitoring programmes
* Existence of common methodologies/guides/protocols.
* No. of meetings for updating the monitoring programmes.
* Common access database for the various monitoring programmes.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.7
|
Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to accidental catches and mortality events, including the monitoring of the incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds on fishing vessels.
* Adoption and implementation of coordination systems at national level (protocols, common data collection templates, common methodologies, common database) to address monitoring and response to these events.
* Percentage of fleet involved in monitoring incidental catch (logbooks, specific actions...)
OBJECTIVE 2012: A1.7
|
Manage processes of invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, especially those identified in the initial evaluation of D2 in the DMLEBA, (blue crab Callinectes sapidus, macrophytes and the ascidian Aplidium accarense), including the development of early warning networks and their coordination at national level.
* Percentage of the area within the demarcation area covered by detection and quantification networks of non-indigenous species.
* Existence of action protocols for IAC screening events.
* Number of marine species categorised on the list of invasive alien species
* Percentage/number of invasive species subject to management measures or actions
* Percentage/number of habitats affected by invasive species which have been subject to management measures or actions
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.3, C.3.6
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through studies, initiatives and scientific projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment.
* Criteria for evaluating and monitoring the results of scientific projects/studies.
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies.
|
Encourage scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment to address the knowledge gaps identified in the Initial Assessment and in the successive phases of Marine Strategies.
* Awareness building on impacts arising from the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment, which are addressed by scientific studies and projects.
OBJECTIVES 2012: B.3.1, B.3.2, B.3.3, B.3.4.
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through studies, initiatives and scientific projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment.
* Criteria for evaluating and monitoring the results of scientific projects/studies.
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies.
|
Keep the lists of endangered species up to date and the assessment of their populations.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.5 Promote the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Keep the lists of endangered species up to date and the assessment of their populations.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.5. Promoting the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote international cooperation in the study and monitoring of populations of geographically wide groups (e.g. cetaceans and reptiles).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.6 Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide species (e.g. fish, cetaceans and reptiles).
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Promote international cooperation in the study and monitoring of populations of geographically wide groups (e.g. cetaceans and reptiles).
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.6. Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide species (e.g. fish, cetaceans and reptiles).
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensuring social participation in the Marine Strategy of the demarcation of the Strait and Alboran Sea, through dissemination, awareness raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
In the second cycle, this objective has remained the same, with the exception of the code:
C.E.6. Ensure social participation in the Marine Strategy of the South Atlantic Basin through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure social participation in the marine strategy of the Levantino-Balearic area through dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
In the second cycle, this objective has remained the same, with the exception of the code:
C.L.6. Ensure social participation in the Marine Strategy of the South Atlantic Basin through outreach, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and stakeholder involvement in the marine environment.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the demarcation of the Strait and Alboran Sea, which carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and exploit synergies.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.7. Achieve proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the South Atlantic basin that carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and exploit synergies.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Levantino-Balearic area which carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.7. Achieve proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the South Atlantic basin that carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and exploit synergies.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To develop management plans for marine recreational activities, or the uses resulting from such activities, such as boat anchoring, diving, recreational fishing, water sports, sightings of cetaceans, etc. for each area of the Strait and Alboran Sea where these activities are relevant.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.8. Promote, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the marine/aquaculture demarcation, or other tools of management, that human activities take place in a way sustainable and not compromising the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Develop management plans for marine recreational activities, or the use thereof, such as pleasure boats, diving, recreational fishing, water sports, cetacean sighting, etc., for each area of the Levantino-Balearic area where these activities are relevant.
|
Ensure that fish stocks are properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.9.Promote that fish stocks are managed
adequately maintained within biological limits
insurance, paying particular attention to those whose status is
unknown, and to those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment
of D3 in the strait of the Estrecho y Alborán (Estero y Alborán).
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Ensure that fish stocks are properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.9.Promote that fish stocks are managed
adequately maintained within biological limits
insurance, paying particular attention to those whose status is
unknown, and to those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment
from D3 in the Balearic Ocean area of the Balearic Islands
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that the area affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities is a small proportion of the total area of the demarcation of the Strait and Alboran area.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.10.Promoting human actions significantly the surface affected by physical loss of funds
natural mariners in relation to the previous cycle in the Strait and Alboran area.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that the area affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities is a small proportion of the total area of the Balearic district.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.10.Promoting human activities
significantly the surface affected by physical loss of funds
natural mariners in relation to the previous cycle in the district
levanno-Balear.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.11.Identified and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities and not threatening the durability and operation of protected habitats or habitats of natural interest, or commit to the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To ensure that biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of biogenic habitats and/or protected habitats and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.11.Promote permanent localised and physical alterations caused by human activities and not threatening the durability and operation of protected habitats or habitats of natural interest, or commit to the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Take mitigation measures in coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so that hydrodynamics and hydrodynamics properties are compatible with the conservation of habitats.
In the second cycle, the wording and the code have been slightly changed.
C.E.12.Take measures on stretches of coastline where alterations
permanent physical physical activity caused by human activities
a significant affection, so that they are compatible with the good condition
environmental status of seabed and hydrographical conditions.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicator has changed.
|
Take mitigation measures in coastal stretches where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so that hydrodynamics and hydrodynamics properties are compatible with the conservation of habitats
In the second cycle, the wording and the code have been slightly changed.
C.L.12.Adopting measures on stretches of coastline where the alterations
permanent physical physical activity caused by human activities
a significant affection, so that they are compatible with the good condition
environmental status of seabed and hydrographical conditions.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, as the code and indicator has changed.
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.15. Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for the general public.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.15. Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for the general public.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To raise awareness of the seabed, in particular its topography, morphology, composition, depth and associated variables, which influence the distribution of habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.12 Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics. .
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
To improve and complement the existing knowledge on the extent, distribution, structure and status of coastal habitats (up to 50m) and their long-term trends, with particular attention to the coastal/sub-regional rock communities, the platform outcrops not associated with the coastline, the marine angiosperm meadows (P. oceanica, C. nodosa, Z. noltii and Ruppia sp.) and the types of soft bottom communities.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.12 Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To improve and complete the existing knowledge on the extent, distribution, structure and condition of coastal habitats (up to 50m) and their long-term trends, with particular attention to the coastal/sub-regional rock communities, the platform outcrops not associated with the coastline, the marine angiosperm meadows (P. oceanica, C. nodosa, Z. noltii and Ruppia sp.), the types of soft bottom communities and the lagoons of coastal waters.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics. .
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase the knowledge on the extension, distribution, structure and status of deep habitats (>50m depth) and their long-term trends, with particular attention to biogenic habitats and protected habitats, seamounts, canyons and volcanoes with underwater mud, rocky bottoms and circalittoral detritus, and below 1000m depth.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.12 Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase the knowledge on the extent, distribution, structure and status of deep habitats (>50m depth) and their long-term trends, with particular attention to biogenic habitats and protected habitats, seamounts, canyons and volcanoes with underwater mud, rocky bottoms and circalittoral detritus, and below 1000m depth.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.L.12. Improve knowledge of the seabed, including physical and biological characteristics.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase awareness of the impact of human activities on habitats, especially biogenic and protected species, their species, populations and communities, their sensitivity, tolerance limits and acclimatisation and acclimatisation, especially in relation to fishing activities, infrastructure construction, dredging, extraction of non-renewable marine resources, pollution and interaction with the effects of climate change (acidification, heating, etc.).
In the second cycle, this objective has been split into two:
C.E.16. Encourage scientific studies and projects to respond to
knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment on
the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
C.E.17. Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming cross-cutting issues
|
Increase awareness of the impact of human activities on habitats, especially biogenic and protected species, their species, populations and communities, their sensitivity, tolerance limits and acclimatisation and acclimatisation, especially in relation to fishing activities, infrastructure construction, dredging, extraction of non-renewable marine resources, pollution and interaction with the effects of climate change (acidification, heating, etc.).
In the second cycle, this objective has been split into two:
C.L.16. Encourage scientific studies and projects to respond to
knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment on
impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems
C.L.17. Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change in
marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to cross-cutting mainstreaming
climate change variable in all phases of Marine Strategies
|
Have information to assess the current status with regard to BEB on the basis of a larger number of commercially important stocks, within which the following specific objectives are identified:
⢠Monitoring and obtaining basic information for species that have not been included in the monitoring programmes so far and have been included in the list of species selected for Descriptor 3.
⢠Improve awareness of the status of selected stocks that currently do not have evaluations leading to major or secondary indicators (as defined in Commission Decision 2010/477/EU).
⢠Avant on the determination of precautionary and management reference values.
|
Have information to assess the current status with regard to BEB on the basis of a larger number of commercially important stocks, within which the following specific objectives are identified:
⢠Monitoring and obtaining basic information for species that have not been included in the monitoring programmes so far and have been included in the list of species selected for Descriptor 3.
⢠Improve awareness of the status of selected stocks that currently do not have evaluations leading to major or secondary indicators (as defined in Commission Decision 2010/477/EU).
⢠Avant on the determination of precautionary and management reference values.
|
Increase awareness of trophic webs of both the coastal strip and deep-water ecosystems, including the study of key organisms as well as the effect of seasonal variations, with a view to developing new indicators to assess the state of the food webs in the future and thus properly defining the Stateâs Good Environmental Status.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.E.11 Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to
develop new indicators to properly assess and define the
Good environmental status.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Increase the awareness of food webs of both the coastal strip and deep-water ecosystems, including the study of key organisms as well as the effect of seasonal variations, with a view to developing new indicators to assess the state of the food webs in the future and thus properly defining the âState of the food websâ of these webs has been amended to:
A.L.11. Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to
develop new indicators to properly assess and define the
Good environmental status
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Develop a national monitoring system for river basin and water variability and establish a target system for alerts on the occurrence of climatic abnormalities that may put pressure on the different marine ecosystems. The system should include a register of hydrographical and biological variables as well as mass and extreme events in marine ecosystems such as:Unusual planktonic blocks, appearance of unusual species in a certain zone and time of year, mass of species or process occurring (mortality, reproduction), etc.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.E.19. Encourage the efficient monitoring of the ocean variables to enable the early detection of the occurrence of climatic anomalies which may put pressure on the different marine ecosystems.
This objective will be produced as a new one, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
Develop a national monitoring system for river basin and water variability and establish a target system for alerts on the occurrence of climatic abnormalities that may put pressure on the different marine ecosystems. The system should include a register of hydrographical and biological variables as well as mass and extreme events in marine ecosystems such as:Unusual planktonic blocks, appearance of unusual species in a certain zone and time of year, mass of species or process occurring (mortality, reproduction), etc.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.L.19. Encourage the efficient monitoring of the ocean variables to enable the early detection of the occurrence of climatic anomalies which may put pressure on the different marine ecosystems.
This objective will be gained as a new objective, given that the code and indicators have changed.
|
Reduce the intensity and area of influence of the significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with particular attention to protected or natural interest habitats.
* Number of initiatives launched to reduce the impact of pressures on protected habitats or natural interests, with a particular focus on fishing with bottom gears and rigging on protected or natural interest habitats, infrastructure construction, exploitation of non-renewable marine resources, dredging, anchoring, recreational activities and other significant pressures on the DM ESAL
* Percentage/number of actions and projects with compatibility report
* Area of protected or natural interest habitats potentially affected by human activities and their trends
* Crop cover for algae and seagrasses
* Existence of regulation of leisure activities affecting the seagrass meadows, in particular anchoring
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.1
|
To promote that human actions do not significantly increase the surface affected by physical loss of natural seabed resources compared to the previous cycle in the Strait and Alboran area.
* Surface affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities
* Area in the area occupied by coastal defence works
* Area covered by the area occupied by works or by installations having as their object other than the defence of the coast
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.1
|
To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
* Percentage of compatibility reports on existing installations.
* Area of protected habitats of natural interest affected by permanent physical alterations.
|
Measures on stretches of coastline where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
⢠No of measures taken in respect of each activity causing significant impact
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.3
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for the general public.
⢠Existence of platforms for access and exchange of information on the marine environment which facilitate the management of public administrations
⢠Means of access and quality of marine environment information available to citizens
⢠Number of metadata available
OBJECTIVE C.3.1
|
Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
* No. of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with these subjects.
* Knowledge-based studies and scientific projects.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with this issue
* Number of monitoring indicators addressing climate change aspects
* Percentage of climate change strategies in Marine Strategies
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impact of human activities on habitats, species, populations and communities
* Criteria for evaluation and monitoring of the results of scientific projects/studies (based on the references in documents)
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies
|
Encourage the efficient monitoring of the ocean variables to enable the early detection of the occurrence of climatic anomalies which may put pressure on the different marine ecosystems.
⢠National system for monitoring river basin variability and hydrodynamics, and system for alerts and recording of mass and extreme events
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation.
* Number of policy/control measures on pathways and vectors for introduction and translocation
* Number of introduction and translocation routes and translocation addressed by policy or regulated measures, such as: Leakages in aquaculture facilities, ballast water, anchoring, 'biofouling', live bait, and all types of discharges.
* Number of events of introduction of invasive non-indigenous species by vector/track
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.2
|
Reducing the disturbance to fauna caused by tourist and recreational activities
* Number of individuals of the species potentially affected (for turtles and birds)
* Number of established protection measures/initiatives to reduce pressure on these populations
|
. To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
⢠Existence of preventive measures within the control programmes.
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.5
|
Ensuring social participation in the marine strategy of the Strait and Alboran area through initiatives for dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
* Number of initiatives for social participation and evaluation of their results
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.3
|
Ensuring proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Strait and Alboran area who carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
* Number of initiatives, projects and coordination meetings
* Thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.4
|
Promote, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the Strait and Alboran area, or other development tools, that human activities take place in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
* Number of human activities covered by the management plan
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.5
|
To promote that fish stocks are properly managed, so that they remain within safe biological limits, paying particular attention to those whose status is unknown, and those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment of D3 in the Estrecho and Alborán marine area.
⢠No and percentage of stocks analysed in relation to the total of stocks that are significantly exploited
⢠No. and percentage of stocks within safe biological limits
⢠No and percentage of stocks at maximum sustainable yield
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.6
|
Reduce the intensity and area of influence of the significant anthropogenic pressures on benthic habitats, with particular attention to protected or natural habitats and taking into account the most significant pressures on the DMLEBA.
* Number of initiatives launched to reduce the impact of pressures on protected or natural interest habitats, with a focus on fishing with bottom gears and rigging, infrastructure construction, exploitation of non-renewable marine resources, dredging, anchoring, recreational activities and other significant pressures on the DMLEBA.
* Percentage/number of actions and projects with compatibility report
* Area of protected or natural interest habitats potentially affected by human activities and their trends
* Crop coverage of algae and seagrasses, especially Posidonia oceanica
* Existence of regulation of leisure activities affecting the seagrass meadows, in particular anchoring
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.1
|
To promote that human actions do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle in the Levantino-Balearic area.
* Surface affected by permanent physical alterations caused by human activities
* Area in the area occupied by coastal defence works
* Area covered by the area occupied by works or by installations having an objective other than the defence of the coast
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.1
|
To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
* Percentage of compatibility reports on existing installations.
* Area of protected habitats of natural interest affected by permanent physical alterations.
|
Measures on stretches of coastline where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
⢠No of measures taken in respect of each activity causing significant impact
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.3
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for the general public.
⢠Existence of platforms for access and exchange of information on the marine environment which facilitate the management of public administrations
⢠Means of access and quality of marine environment information available to citizens
⢠Number of metadata available
OBJECTIVE C.3.1
|
Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
* No. of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with these subjects.
* Knowledge-based studies and scientific projects.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with this issue
* Number of monitoring indicators addressing climate change aspects
* Percentage of climate change strategies in Marine Strategies
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impact of human activities on habitats, species, populations and communities
* Criteria for evaluation and monitoring of the results of scientific projects/studies (based on the references in documents)
* Objectives and management measures for which the design has taken into account the results of scientific projects/studies
|
Encourage the efficient monitoring of the ocean variables to enable the early detection of the occurrence of climatic anomalies which may put pressure on the different marine ecosystems.
⢠National system for monitoring river basin variability and hydrodynamics, and system for alerts and recording of mass and extreme events
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation.
* Number of policy/control measures on pathways and vectors for introduction and translocation
* Number of introduction and translocation routes and translocation addressed by policy or regulated measures, such as: Leakages in aquaculture facilities, ballast water, anchoring, 'biofouling', live bait, and all types of discharges.
* Number of events of introduction of invasive non-indigenous species by vector/track
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.2
|
Reducing the disturbance to fauna caused by tourist and recreational activities
* Number of individuals of the species potentially affected (for turtles and birds)
* Number of established protection measures/initiatives to reduce pressure on these populations
|
. To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
⢠Existence of preventive measures within the control programmes.
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.5
|
To ensure social participation in the marine strategy of the Levantino-Balearic area through dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
* Number of initiatives for social participation and evaluation of their results
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.3
|
Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Levantino-Balearic area which carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
* Number of initiatives, projects and coordination meetings
* Thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.4
|
Promote, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the Levantino-Balearic Area and/or other development tools, that human activities be developed in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
* Number of human activities covered by the management plan
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.5
|
To encourage fish stocks to be properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits, paying particular attention to those whose status is unknown, and to those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment of D3 in the Balearic Ocean Marine Demarcation.
⢠No and percentage of stocks analysed in relation to the total of stocks that are significantly exploited
⢠No. and percentage of stocks within safe biological limits
⢠No and percentage of stocks at maximum sustainable yield
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.6
|
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timescale |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
Update date |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
Update type |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
superficie del fondo marino |
superficie del fondo marino |
Especies alóctonas invasoras |
Especies alóctonas invasoras |
Aves marinas |
Aves marinas |
Mamíferos marinos |
Mamíferos marinos |
Reptiles marinos |
Reptiles marios |
Elasmobranquios |
Elasmobranquios |
Habitats |
Habitats |
Mamíferos marinos |
Reptiles marinos |
Reptiles marinos |
Especies comerciales de peces |
Especies comerciales de peces |
Mamíferos, aves, tortugas |
Mamíferos, aves, tortugas |
Porcentaje de la Demarcación estudiada |
Porcentaje de la Demarcación estudiada |
Proporción de hábitats costeros estudiados |
Proporción de hábitats costeros estudiados |
proporción de hábitats profundos estudiados |
proporción de hábitats profundos estudiados |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
Especies |
Especies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Size distribution
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter - other |
All parameters
|
All parameters
|
policy measures
|
measures on vectors for introduction
|
Number of species targeted
|
Number of species to be tested
|
existence of programmes
|
existence of control programmes
|
Existence of coordination system
|
Existence of coordination system
|
Existence of surveillance systems
|
Existence of surveillance systems
|
State of conservation of fish
|
State of conservation of fish
|
Range of Distribution Range
|
Range of Distribution Range
|
Range of Distribution Range
|
Range of Distribution Range
|
Reviews of the catalogue
|
Catalogue reviews
|
Participation in initiatives
|
Participation in initiatives
|
Social participation initiatives
|
Social participation initiatives
|
Coordination actions
|
Coordination actions
|
Existence of management plans
|
Existence of management plans
|
Parameters used in the evaluation of D3
|
Parameters used in the evaluation of D3
|
Medical condition
|
Heath condition
|
Degree of access
|
Degree of access
|
Number of studies
|
Number of studies
|
Number of stocks
|
Number of stocks
|
existence of indicators
|
existence of indicators
|
Existence of System
|
Existence of System
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
108.0 |
311.0 |
10.28 |
8.46 |
17.38 |
11.29 |
3.7 |
1.39 |
13.25 |
9.34 |
53.37 |
34.94 |
6.48 |
7.48 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit - other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2108 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
0212-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target assessment description |
(SEE 9 GES reporting for the different arbitrators)
objective 0 is considered unnecessary since it coincides with the main aim of the Directive: Achieve BEA in all descriptors
|
(SEE 9 GES reporting for the different arbitrators)
objective 0 is considered unnecessary since it coincides with the main aim of the Directive: Achieve BEA in all descriptors
|
According to the pressure analysis, the minimum surface area of the sea bottom of the Strait and Alborán sea bed has suffered some sort of disturbance during the present assessment period is 108 million m², or 0.43 %.
However, the fact that trawl fishing could not be taken into account, an activity highly relevant to this analysis, is considered to be impossible to determine whether or not the target is met.
It is proposed to maintain the objective, simplifying its wording and focusing more on indicators towards the main pressures from the Demarcación Marina Strait and Alborán, on the other hand.
The indicator is too general to assess the target and it is therefore proposed to amend it and to combine it with other indicators to assess the initiatives launched to achieve pressure reduction.
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C as it is clearly intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
The minimum surface area of the seabed
from the levantic DM which has been
if you have suffered some sort of disturbance
during the current period of
evaluation is 311 million m².
representing 0.13Â % of the area
demarcation
Because it could not be taken into account
trawling, one
very relevant activity for this
analysis not possible
determine whether or not the target is met
|
Progress was noted. It is desirable to continue this line.
Actions:
⢠IMO Waters Convention (in force since 2017)
⢠Implementation of the EU Regulation on Invasive Species
⢠Dredging guidelines
However, there is a problem of non-native species growing in the strait and Alborán area (see initial evaluation of D2) and the measures to prevent their expansion should be stepped up.
It is proposed to maintain the objective, without listing the possible pathways in the target, to shorten it and not to limit the possibilities.
Indicating the pathways and translocation of non-native species identified in the initial assessment of D2.
It is appropriate to modify the indicator so that it provides information on the number or percentage of anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation dealt with by policy or regulated measures. This indicator should indicate the pathways for the introduction and translocation of non-indigenous species, in particular those identified in the initial assessment of D2.
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C since it is intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Progress was noted. It is desirable
continue along this line.
Actions:
Convention on Aguas de Lastre
IMO (in force since 2017)
Implementation of the Regulation
Community species on species
IS
Dredging guidelines
However, there is one in the DMALBA.
the problem of non-native species in
expansion (see initial evaluation of
D2) and should therefore be stepped up
measures to prevent their expansion
It is proposed to maintain the objective, without
list the possible pathways into the
objective, to shorten it and not
narrow down the possibilities.
An indicator should be added
providing information
the number or percentage of tracks
and anthropogenic vectors of
translocation addressed by measures
acting or regulated. In this
indicator, the routes of
introduction and translocation of
non-indigenous species in particular
identified in the initial assessment
from D2
It is also proposed to include this
target group C as it is
making it compatible with:
human activities with
marine conservation
|
According to the Initial Assessment of D2 Estrecho y Alborán, there has been an increase of invasive non-indigenous species, particularly important algae.
It is proposed to change the target, as the eradication of IS is very complex and indeed in many cases cannot be addressed. It is proposed to be transformed into an integrated management objective, covering prevention (early detection networks) and management measures, thus covering this objective and C.3.6.
It is proposed to amend the indicator to reflect the percentage of invasive species that have been committed.
|
C.3.6.
It is proposed to modify the indicator for
form reflecting the percentage of
invasive species that have been
action to be taken. Shall be made.
specific mention of species
identified in the initial assessment
of D2 as the most problematic
in demarcation
|
Birds: There is not enough data to assess mortality, see initial evaluation of D1-marine birds of the MD and Alborán.
It is proposed that the aim be maintained by simplifying its wording. It is also proposed to divide the indicator into several, more oriented to addressing the causes and pressures identified as the most important in the MDF and Alborán area:
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C as it is clearly intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Birds: Not compliant for snapshots
Balearic and Balearic Islands and Gull
Audouin (see initial evaluation of D1 â
seabird species in DMALBA).
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
simplifying wording.
It is also proposed to divide the
multiple, more oriented to
addressing the causes and pressures
identified as most important
on the DMLEBA
It is also proposed to include this
target group C as it is
clearly targeted at
making activities compatible
human beings with conservation
marine environment
|
Mammals: A high level of mortality has been observed in the production process, but it is attributable to illness (not anthropogenic causes). For the rest, there is no data to assess the indicator.
See initial evaluation of D1-species marine mammals â Estrecho y Alborán â D-Marine Mammals.
It is proposed to maintain the objective by simplifying its wording. it is also proposed to divide the indicator into several, more focused on the causes and pressures identified as the most important in the case of the case of the Strait and Alborán region:
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C as it is clearly intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Or insufficient data
(see initial evaluation of D1-marine mammal within the DMALBA)
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
simplifying wording.
It is also proposed to divide the
multiple, more oriented to
addressing the causes and pressures
identified as most important
on the DMLEBA
It is also proposed to include this
target group C as it is
clearly targeted at
making activities compatible
human beings with conservation
marine environment
|
Turtles: It cannot be evaluated due to a lack of data, see the initial evaluation of the D1-marine reptiles of the SAL).
It is proposed to maintain the objective by simplifying its wording. it is also proposed to divide the indicator into several, more focused on the causes and pressures identified as the most important in the case of the case of the Strait and Alborán region:
It is also proposed to include this objective in group C as it is clearly intended to make human activities compatible with the conservation of the marine environment.
|
Turtles: Cannot be evaluated due to a lack of evaluation
data (see initial evaluation of D1 â
marine species of the
DMALBA)
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
simplifying wording.
It is also proposed to divide the
multiple, more oriented to
addressing the causes and pressures
identified as most important
on the DMLEBA
It is also proposed to include this
target group C as it is
clearly targeted at
making activities compatible
human beings with conservation
marine environment
|
Cannot be evaluated. No information on the indicator.
There are measures such as:
In RN2000, non-native species cannot be grown.
It is proposed that the aim be maintained, on the proposal of the experts and by the foreseeable rise of aquaculture.
The indicator will be changed to âprevention measures in control programmesâ as the existence of the programmes themselves is mandatory.
It changes to group C.
|
Cannot be evaluated. No information
on the indicator.
There are measures such as: in RN2000, non-native species cannot be grown
It is proposed to maintain the objective:
experts proposal and
expected growth in aquaculture. The
flag will be changed to âexistence
of prevention measures in
control programmesâ, as the
|
Cannot be evaluated. The DM ESAL corresponds to part of the FAO 37.1.1 catch area. Catch data could not be disaggregated by sea demarcation
|
Still in the area
37.1.1 were fished in total.
18Â 416.93Â kg of species: ETX, SYR,
BCD, CWO, SLBL, GAM, CFB (de
largest to a lesser extent caught)
between 2012 and 2018 out of a total of
24Â 069.85Â kg caught by the fleet
Spanish in national fishing ground waters.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue this line.
The wording of this objective corresponds better to one measure. Amend the wording to suit an objective, and the indicator to enable it to measure the level of achievement of the target.
Further divide the target into two: One aimed at improving the coordination of monitoring programmes for species and habitats, and one focusing on beaching and accidental catches. In addition, it is proposed to include an explicit reference to the improvement of the monitoring of incidental catch by the fishing industry (objective proposed under MISTIC SEAS II for Macaronesia, which is considered to be scalable to the other demarcations).
|
Progress was noted. Is necessary
continue along this line
The wording of this objective is
it corresponds better to one measure.
Edit wording to bring it into line with
an objective, and the indicator to
measure achievement can be measured
of the
Further divide the target into two:
one aiming at the improvement of the
coordination of programmes of
monitoring of species and habitats, and
another focus on berections and
incidental catches. In the latter,
in addition, it is proposed to include a
explicit reference to improving
follow-up of incidental catch
for the fisheries sector
(target proposed in the framework of the
African seas II for Macaronesia,
is considered to be scalable to the rest of
demarcations)
|
This objective is considered as a measure targeted at the general objective of âEnsuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measuresâ.
Change indicator as it is currently too general, not only linked to the objective. To be included as an indicator, within the above mentioned objective, as follows:
⢠Percentage of marine species/habitats not found or threatened, subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies. Indicator: Number of species/habitats targeted for recovery and restoration.
|
This objective is considered as a measure targeted at the general objective of âEnsuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measuresâ.
To be included as an indicator, within the above mentioned objective, as follows:
⢠Percentage of marine species/habitats not found in BEA or threatened, which are subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
|
Progress was noted. Active surveillance systems exist on the ground, although the monitoring of protected areas of protected areas (EMP) is to be completed.
There are also remote surveillance systems such as buoys, satellites, radio-positioning of vessels by radio (AIS) and satellite (VMS), etc.
It is proposed to change the target in order to focus more on monitoring compliance with the established rules, with a view to protecting marine ecosystems.
Modify indicators to provide information on the degree of surveillance carried out, such as the number of infringement files, surveillance hours or the human resources allocated for this purpose.
|
Progress was noted. There are systems
in situ active surveillance, however it is
planned to complete the monitoring of
Protected marine areas (EMP)
Surveillance systems also exist
remote, such as buoys, satellites,
geolocalisation of vessels, by
radio (AIS) and satellite (VMS) etc
It is proposed to change the objective of
focus more on the
monitoring compliance
rules laid down in the interest of the
ecosystem protection
seafarers
Edit indicator to provide input
information on the grade of
surveillance performed, such as number
of infringement dossiers,
surveillance or human resources
intended for the purpose
|
% DM ESAL included in Rampe: 10.28Â %
% biogenic/protected/special interest in Rampe: There is no information to reply to this indicator.
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue this line.
The inclusion or not of an MLE in Rampe is not an indicator of protection in itself (this protection is achieved through the MLE statement and the approval of the corresponding management plan).
It is proposed to replace this objective with the objective of âAchieving a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well managed network of marine protected areasâ. The indicator will also be amended to ensure that it complies with the objectives of Rampe.
|
Progress was noted. Is necessary
continue along this line
% DM LEABA included in Rampe: 8.46Â %
% biogenic/protected dot/
special interest in Rampe: Does not exist
information to respond to this
indicator
The inclusion or not of a MLE in the
Rampe is not an indicator of protection
yes (this protection is achieved by
means the MLE and the MLE declaration.
approval of the respective plan
of management)
It is proposed to replace this objective.
for the achievement of a complete network,
ecologically representative:
coherent and well managed areas
marine protectedâ. To be amended
also the indicator for
putting it into compliance with the
objectives of Rampe
|
Of DM included in RN2000: 17,38
% RN2000 of the area of ESAL with management plans: 2Â %.
This objective is considered to be more a measure and is therefore proposed to be included in a more comprehensive objective, namely to âEnsure the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measuresâ by including as indicators of this target share of the MLE included in the MLE,
Percentage of the area of habitats of Community interest included in RN2000
Percentage of MLE with management plan
|
% DMLEBA included in RN2000: 11,29
% RN2000 of the LEBA with plans of
management: 1.26Â %
This objective is considered to be more effective.
a measure and is therefore proposed
be included in a more targeted objective
comprehensive, namely:
conservation and recovery of
marine biodiversity through
effective instruments and measuresâ
through inclusion as
indicators of that objective:
The percentage of the DM included in EMP,
Percentage of surface area of
habitats of Community interest
included in RN2000
Percentage of MLE with a plan of
management
|
It is not possible to assess due to a lack of data.
It is considered that the D3 should not be included in this objective. In any case, it would correspond in part with the criterion D3C3 for commercial species, so this objective would be implicit in the BEA of D3C3.
On the other hand, for all other species, this objective could be considered as part of Criterion D1C3.
The aim is to eliminate this objective because it is the same as the specific criteria of the BEA.
|
SEE 9 GES reporting for indicator 1.3.1
It is not possible to assess due to a lack of data.
It is considered that the D3 should not be included in this objective. In any case, it would correspond in part with the criterion D3C3 for commercial species, so this objective would be implicit in the BEA of D3C3.
On the other hand, for all other species, this objective could be considered as part of Criterion D1C3.
The aim is to eliminate this objective because it is the same as the specific criteria of the BEA.
|
SEE 9 GES reporting for criteria 1.7
It is not possible to assess due to a lack of data.
It is considered that the D3 of this objective should be excluded, as it is already assessed via D3C2 and D3C1.
It could be considered to be covered by the criteria of the D1 as a whole, applied to large fish. This is intended to be deleted.
|
SEE 9 GES reporting for criteria 1.7
It is not possible to assess due to a lack of data
It is considered that the D3 of this objective should be excluded, as it is already evaluated via D3C2 and D3C1.
It could be considered to be covered by the criteria of the D1 as a whole, applied to large fish. It is suggested to delete
|
Mammals: â No information, except
for the islandsâ bottlenecking dolphin
Balearic Islands, which is considered to be BEA for
the D1C4 (see initial evaluation D1 â
mammals â marine
|
Mammals: â the group of deep sea dentists is considered to be BEA for D1C4 (see initial evaluation D1-marine mammals.
|
Turtles: The loggerhead turtle is considered to be in BEA for D1C4 (see initial evaluation D1-turtles).
|
Turtles: The turtle is considered to be turtle
Bboa is located in BEA for D1C4
(see initial evaluation D1-turtles)
|
D3- Commercial species: Progress (see initial evaluation of D3).
It is proposed to change the target to better reflect the balance of the entire ecosystem as a whole, not just populations of certain species.
|
D3- Commercial species: The target
not reached (see initial evaluation)
from D3)
It is proposed to change the target.
in order to better reflect the
ecosystem balance
together, not only
populations of certain
species
|
D1 BIRDS: It is not possible to calculate the trends accurately. It is considered that this is not met as the Audouinâs gull not reached by BEB for the abundance parameter (D1C2).
D1 Mammals: â it is only in the case of the small squin of the Strait of Gibraltar that it has been established that it does not reach the BEA for the parameter of abundance.
Although several estimators have been found for some of the elements, most do not have the necessary precision and frequencies to be able to understand the trends.
D1 Tortugas: There is not enough data to assess the target.
It is proposed to change the target to better reflect the balance of the entire ecosystem as a whole, not just populations of certain species.
|
D1 BIRDS: Cannot be evaluated with
data available, or does not apply
(depending on species)
D1 Mammals: Cannot be evaluated
(measurable for common dolphin only).
Despite the fact that there are several
estimator of abundance for some of the
the elements, most of them do not have the
precision and frequencies necessary for
be able to learn about the trends.
D1 Tortugas: Not assessed. No data
It is proposed to change the target.
in order to better reflect the
ecosystem balance
together, not only
populations of certain
species
|
Cannot be evaluated due to a lack of data.
It is proposed to maintain, since it does not fully coincide with any criterion, but it favours the achievement of the BEA.
|
Cannot be evaluated due to lack of data
It is proposed to maintain, since it does not fully coincide with any criterion, but it favours the achievement of the BEA.
|
Cannot be evaluated due to a lack of data.
It is proposed to remove, since it directly refers to maintaining the descriptors of status in terms of values corresponding to the BEA, it is therefore in line with the criteria of the two descriptors.
|
Cannot be evaluated due to a lack of data.
It is proposed to remove, as it directly refers to maintaining the descriptors of status in terms of values corresponding to the BEA, and is therefore in line with the criteria of the two descriptors.
|
2 reviews have been carried out since 2012 (in 2015 and 2016) of the
List of wild species under special protection regime and the Spanish catalogue of endangered species.
For the Mediterranean, in 2015, the list of wild species was included under the special protection regime:
The Mediterranean box (Galeorhinus galeus).
â Mediterranean shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus).
In the Mediterranean (Lamna nasus).
Red ray (Leucoraja circularis)
â Southern Mediterranean ray (Leucoraja melitensis).
â Guitopa barbanegra de del Mediterraneo (Rhinobatos cemiculus).
Mediterranean common guitar (Rhinobatos rhinobatos).
the objective is therefore considered to be progressing and should be continued on this line.
The wording is considered to be closer to the concrete measure than is the case. It is proposed to change the target so as to approach marine species on the list of threatened species.
The indicator could be changed to reflect the number of marine species catalogued/discatalogued or change category on the list of threatened species. An indicator showing whether stock assessments are ongoing should also be added.
It is proposed to move to type A, as it is a tool to ensure the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity.
|
2 has been completed since 2012
revisions (in 2015 and 2016) of
List of wild species in
Special Protection Regime and Spanish Catalogue of Species
Endangered.
For the Mediterranean Sea, in 2015
they were included in the list of species.
Protection scheme wild
special:
The Mediterranean box
(Galeorhinus galeus)
â Southern Mediterranean shortfin mako sharks
(Isurus oxyrinchus)
â Mediterranean caking (Lamna)
nasus)
â false ray of the Mediterranean
(Leucoraja circularis)
â Southern Mediterranean skate
(Leucoraja melitensis)
â Drum guitar from
Mediterranean (Rhinobatos)
cmiculus.)
Mediterranean guitar
(rhinobatos rhinobatos)
the objective is therefore considered to be:
progress is in progress and should be addressed.
continue along this line.
The wording is considered to be
closer to the concept of
a specific measure to be targeted.
It is proposed to change the target.
so it is approached in
consider marine species
on species lists
endangered.
The indicator could:
to be amended to reflect the
number of marine species which
they are catalogued/discatalogued, or
change category in
list of threatened species.
Should also be added
indicator showing whether or not there is any
carrying out evaluation of
stocks.
It is proposed to pass type A, given
it is an instrument
for the purpose of conservation and
recovery of biodiversity
marine
|
Objective fulfilled.
International initiatives:
â ACCOBEMS Initiative).
Barcelona Convention: IMAP Common Indicators 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (QSR 2017 assessment).
GFCM and ICCAT assessment groups
It is proposed to keep the objective with drafting changes, in order to make it more suitable for an objective, as it currently could correspond to a specific measure.
It is proposed to move to type A, as it is a tool to ensure the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity.
|
Objective fulfilled
International initiatives:
â ACCOBEMS Initiative)
Barcelona Convention: IMAP
Common Indicators 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
(assessment QSR 2017)
GFCM assessment groups and
by ICCAT.
It is proposed to maintain the objective.
with amendments to the
more worded, so that it can be done more?
suitable for a given objective,
which currently could
correspond to a measure
concrete.
It is proposed to pass type A, given
it is an instrument
for the purpose of conservation and
recovery of biodiversity
marine
|
Objective achieved:
Expert PdS workshops: 14 (Workshops and meetings with administrations and survey)
Expert workshop for the design of the MIP: 21
⢠Dissemination: 1 workshop (by DM), 1 Dissemination campaign (dissemination materials)
⢠2 CONAMAS
⢠Education and participation projects: 22 (BIO) including INTEMARES
⢠Volunteering:
⢠Meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
⢠Public consultation of documents from the Member States: 3
It is proposed to keep this objective for the second cycle, so as to ensure social participation in the Member States.
|
Objective achieved:
Expert Workshops on PoS:
14 (Workshops and meetings with
administrations and survey)
Design experts workshop
MIP: 21
â Dissemination: 1 workshop (by DM), 1
Material campaign (materials)
informative)
2 CONAMAS
Education projects and
participation: 22 (FBIO)
including INTEMARES
Voluntary campaigns:
Meetings with sectors: 1 workshop
on socio-economic analysis
Public consultation of documents
Member States: 3
It is proposed to maintain this
target for the second cycle,
to ensure participation
social in Member States
|
Target achieved
⢠ICES meetings: 6
⢠Follow-up Committee meetings ESAL 6
⢠Autonomous Community meetings on marine biodiversity: 5
⢠DMESAL data flow establishment
⢠working groups:
WG Biodiversity: 1
Marine cartography: 10
Descriptor 9 GT: 1
WG Seat-Data: 2
WG Technical WG Costa: 6
⢠meetings with sectors: 1 workshop on socio-economic analysis
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by improving the wording for the second cycle, to make further progress in the coordination of public administrations.
It is proposed to add as indicator:
âNumber of thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken, compared to the previous cycleâ.
|
Target achieved
ICES meetings: 6
Committee meetings of
LEBA monitoring: 6
Communities meetings
regions on biodiversity
marine: 16
Establishment of the flow rate of
DMALBA data
Working groups:
WG Biodiversity: 1
Marine cartography: 10
Descriptor 9 GT: 1
WG Seat-Data: 2
WG Technical WG Costa: 6
Meetings with sectors: 1 workshop
on socio-economic analysis
It is proposed to maintain the objective.
By improving the wording for the
second cycle, to make further progress
on coordination of
general government
It is proposed to add as follows:
indicator:
ânumber of thematic areas in which
take initiatives of
coordination with regard to
previous cycleâ
|
Progress is being made, although not all recreational marine activities are regulated.
⢠EMP Management Plans
⢠State legislation on the protection of cetaceans and recreational fisheries
It is proposed to change the target and indicator to cover all activities and uses, in line with the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive.
|
Progress was made, but no progress was made.
all marine activities
regulated
EMP Management Plans
State legislation on
protection of cetaceans and fisheries
recreational
Progress was made, but no progress was made.
all marine activities
regulated
EMP Management Plans
State legislation on
protection of cetaceans and fisheries
recreational
|
The target is not achieved: Of the 15 stocks analysed (79Â % of the total), none of them comply with the BEA, 2 are in poor condition and the rest have not been assessed.
It is proposed that the aim should be maintained, by improving the wording and focusing on all stocks that fall outside the scope of the BEA.
|
The target is not achieved: Of the 23
stocks analysed (70Â % of total), only
1 fulfils the BEA and 12 have not been
evaluated
|
The objective is considered to have been achieved.
Indicator value for the period 2011-2016: 3 668 617 m². 0.015 % of the surface area of the EstDemarcación Estrecho y Alborán has been affected by permanent physical alterations in the period under review (2011-2016).
See evaluation of the pressure âphysical lossesâ in the DM ESAL.
It is proposed to amend as it is very similar to criterion D6C1. It could be transformed into a pressure target so as to ensure that new activities of human activities do not significantly increase the surface area affected by physical loss of natural marine resources compared to the previous cycle.
The indicators may also distinguish the area occupied by coastal defence infrastructure from which they do not have this objective.
|
The objective is considered to have been
achieved
Indicator value for period
FROM 2011-2016: 1 385 204 m². 0,0006
% of surface area of the Demarcation
levanno-Balear has been affected by
permanent physical alterations to the
period analysed (2011-2016)
See evaluation of pressure âlossesâ
physicalâ in the DMLEBA.
It is proposed to amend as it is
very similar to criterion D6C1. SE
could be transformed into one
pressure Objective, so that
to ensure that the new
actions taken on activities
human number not increased
significant area
affected by physical loss of
natural seabed resources with
compared to the previous cycle.
And through
indicators may be distinguished from
area occupied by
defence infrastructure
coastal areas not covered by it
objective
|
It is not possible to assess precisely.
It is proposed to maintain the objective, improving the wording.
It is proposed to modify the indicator in a way that is quantifiable, and to add another concerning the proportion of compatibility reports on existing installations.
|
It is not possible to assess accurately
It is proposed to maintain the objective, improving the wording.
It is proposed to modify the indicator in a way that is quantifiable, and to add another concerning the proportion of compatibility reports on existing installations.
|
Very generic indicator.
It is proposed to change the wording of the target in order to make it more specific and linked to the BEA, and that of the indicator, as it is very generic and does not correspond strictly to the objective. The indicator could be in line with the number of measures taken for each human action that causes physical alterations.
|
Very generic indicator
It is proposed to change the wording of the target in order to make it more specific and linked to the BEA, and that of the indicator, as it is very generic and does not correspond strictly to the objective. The indicator could be in line with the number of mitigation measures taken for each human action that causes physical alterations.
|
Target achieved
All Member State documents are publicly available on MITECOâs website.
However, it can be improved.
For the second cycle, it is proposed to specify and extend the target audience, so as to improve access to information on the marine environment available to all maritime administrations and institutions, as well as to the general public.
|
Target achieved
All Member State documents are publicly available on MITECO's website
However, it can be improved.
For the second cycle, it is proposed to specify and extend the target audience, so as to improve access to information on the marine environment available to all maritime administrations and institutions, as well as to the general public.
|
Progress was noted.
Indicator Value: 13.25Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and going into type A, simplifying its wording.
|
Progress detected
Indicator Value: 9.34Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
by merging C.3.2, C.3.3 and C.3.4. and
pass them for Type A, simplifying
on top of its wording
|
Progress detected
Indicator Value: 53.37Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and going to type A. It is proposed to further simplify the wording.
|
Progress detected
Indicator Value: 34.94Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
by merging C.3.2, C.3.3 and C.3.4. and
going to type A, simplifying
on top of its wording
|
Progress was noted.
Indicator Value: 6.48Â %.
It is proposed to maintain the objective, by merging C.3.2, C.3.3. and C.3.4. and passing them to type A, further simplifying the wording.
|
Progress detected
Indicator Value: 7.48Â %
It is proposed to maintain the objective,
by merging C.3.2, C.3.3 and C.3.4. and
pass them for Type A, simplifying
on top of its wording
|
Progress was noted.
In order to simplify, it is proposed to join all the objectives for the increase of knowledge in the following unit objective: âstudies and scientific projects address the knowledge gaps identified in the IAâ.
Of this objective, it is proposed to keep the improvement of knowledge on the effects of climate change on the marine environment separately and to incorporate the intention to consider this variable in the different phases of marine strategies.
|
Progress was noted.
In order to simplify, it is proposed to join all the objectives for the increase of knowledge in the following unit objective: âScientific studies and projects address the knowledge gaps identified in the ISâ
Of this objective, it is proposed to keep the improvement of knowledge on the effects of climate change on the marine environment separately and to incorporate the intention to consider this variable in the different phases of marine strategies.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue this line.
It is proposed to remove the objective since it overlaps with the implementation of commercial species monitoring programmes.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
It is proposed to remove the objective since it overlaps with the implementation of commercial species monitoring programmes.
|
Progress was detected.
It is proposed to maintain, with a simpler wording, as it fully matches the needs of D4.
It is proposed to go to type A.
|
Progress detected
It is proposed to maintain with one
simpler wording, post
this is fully in line with the
needs of D4.
It is proposed to go al type A
|
Progress is detected on the monitoring of river basin variability but no alert system has yet been established.
The objective and the indicator overlap. It is proposed to change the wording of the target so as to make it more general, and its compliance can be measured by the indicator.
|
Progress is detected on monitoring of river basin variability but no alert system has yet been established
The objective and the indicator overlap. It is proposed to change the wording of the target so as to make it more general, and its compliance can be measured by the indicator.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|