Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D3 / Estonia / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Estonia |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2024-12-11 14:54:57 |
BAL-EE-AA-AA
Regional assessment area |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
||||||||
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in 25-32
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
|||||||||||||||||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
|||||||||||||||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
|
Parameter |
BIOM/Catch ratio
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
ABU-REL
|
ABU-REL
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Abundance
|
Not assessed
|
ABU-REL
|
Not assessed
|
BIOM/Catch ratio
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Not assessed
|
ABU-REL
|
Not assessed
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Not assessed
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.6 |
0.34 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
100.0 |
108036.0 |
541000.0 |
0.6 |
100.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.34 |
541000.0 |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.25 |
0.36 |
0.48 |
0.23 |
16.0 |
81038.0 |
1050344.0 |
0.38 |
16.0 |
0.25 |
0.48 |
0.38 |
0.23 |
0.355 |
1050344.0 |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
ratio
|
percentage
|
tonne
|
tonne
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
percentage
|
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
16.7 |
57.1 |
18.2 |
100.0 |
42.9 |
16.7 |
57.1 |
42.9 |
18.2 |
100.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
|||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Not assessed |
||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
||||||||||
Description parameter |
Ratio between annual commercial catch biomass and biomass index in monitoring fisheries |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
Abundance index of sexually mature perch in monitoring catches |
ABU-REL: abundance of spawners compared to salmon spawner abundance estimate PSPC (100%) |
The abundance index of yellow eel recruitment (recruitment index) to the Baltic sea area |
Abundance index of large (TL>250 mm) perch in monitoring catches |
The abundance index of yellow eel recruitment (recruitment index) to the Baltic sea area |
Ratio between annual commercial catch biomass and biomass index in monitoring fisheries |
Abundance index of sexually mature perch in monitoring catches |
Abundance index of large (TL>250 mm) perch in monitoring catches |
ABU-REL, abundance of spawners compared to salmon spawner abundance estimate PSPC (100%) |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
|
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
|||||||||||||||||
Description element |
assessment based on ICES (2022) assessment: Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL). ICES Scientific Reports. 4:62. 297 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.20418840 |
assessment based on ICES (2022) assessment: Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL). ICES Scientific Reports. 4:62. 297 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.20418840 |
assessment based on ICES (2022) assessment: Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL). ICES Scientific Reports. 4:62. 297 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.20418840 |
assessment based on ICES (2022) assessment: Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS). ICES Scientific Reports. 4:44. 659 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.19793014 |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
|||||||||
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
|||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||||||||
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
|||||||||
Description overall status |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Sprattus sprattus because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. Salmo salar was also not assessed for D3C1 and D3C3 due to a lack of sufficient data. |
|||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Test TV |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-EE_13
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
|||
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||
Element 2 |
||||||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
|||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
BIOM/Catch ratio
|
Abundance
|
LBI
|
BIOM/Catch ratio
|
Abundance
|
LBI
|
Threshold value upper |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.38 |
0.38 |
0.38 |
0.375 |
0.375 |
0.375 |
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
ratio
|
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Ratio between annual commercial catch biomass and biomass index in monitoring fisheries |
Abundance index of sexually mature female pikeperch |
Aggregated value for 95 % percentile of the length distribution of pikeperch in monitoring catches |
Ratio between annual commercial catch biomass and biomass index in monitoring fisheries |
Abundance index of sexually mature female pikeperch |
Aggregated value for 95 % percentile of the length distribution of pikeperch in monitoring catches |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
|||
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-EGB-Coastal
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
|||
Element extent |
|||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
||||||
Element 2 |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 27 and 29-32 (northern central and northern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 27 and 29-32 (northern central and northern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 27 and 29-32 (northern central and northern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 27 and 29-32 (northern central and northern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 27 and 29-32 (northern central and northern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 27 and 29-32 (northern central and northern Baltic Sea) |
|||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
||||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
BIOM/Catch ratio
|
Abundance
|
LBI
|
BIOM/Catch ratio
|
Abundance
|
LBI
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
|||
Value achieved upper |
0.63 |
0.63 |
0.38 |
0.625 |
0.625 |
0.375 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
ratio
|
|||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
|||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|||
Description parameter |
Ratio between annual commercial catch biomass and biomass index in monitoring fisheries |
Abundance index of sexually mature flounders is used for assessment |
Aggregated value for 95 % percentile of the length distribution of flounders in monitoring catches |
Ratio between annual commercial catch biomass and biomass index in monitoring fisheries |
Abundance index of sexually mature flounders is used for assessment |
Aggregated value for 95 % percentile of the length distribution of flounders in monitoring catches |
|||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||||||
Description element |
|||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
|||
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
|||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
|||
Description overall status |
|||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Test TV |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_28-1
Regional assessment area |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
||
Element extent |
||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||||
Element 2 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 28.1 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 28.1 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 28.1 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 28.1 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 28.1 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 28.1 |
||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
|||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Not assessed
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
0.28 |
72907.0 |
0.28 |
72907.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
0.27 |
110763.0 |
0.267 |
110763.0 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
tonne
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
||||
Trend parameter |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Not assessed |
|||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
|||
Description parameter |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|||||
Description element |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reporting method feature |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
|||
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
|||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
|||
Description overall status |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Test TV |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_28-2
Regional assessment area |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
||
Element extent |
||||||||
Trend element |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|||||
Element 2 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
|||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Not assessed
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
1.76 |
0.52 |
1.76 |
0.515 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
||||
Trend parameter |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Not assessed |
|||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
|||
Description parameter |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The SSB/MSYBtrigger ratio was used for the assessment of spawning stock biomass (SSB): the ratio of the estimated spawning stock biomass (SSB) to the minimum spawning biomass (MSYBtrigger), which ensures maximum sustainable yield when fishing mortality Fmsy is applied. |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The SSB/MSYBtrigger ratio was used for the assessment of spawning stock biomass (SSB): the ratio of the estimated spawning stock biomass (SSB) to the minimum spawning biomass (MSYBtrigger), which ensures maximum sustainable yield when fishing mortality Fmsy is applied. |
||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
|||||
Description element |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reporting method feature |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
|||
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
|||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
|||
Description overall status |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Test TV |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_29
Regional assessment area |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
||
Element extent |
||||||||
Trend element |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|||||
Element 2 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
|||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Not assessed
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
1.76 |
0.52 |
1.76 |
0.515 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
||||
Trend parameter |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Not assessed |
|||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
|||
Description parameter |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The SSB/MSYBtrigger ratio was used for the assessment of spawning stock biomass (SSB): the ratio of the estimated spawning stock biomass (SSB) to the minimum spawning biomass (MSYBtrigger), which ensures maximum sustainable yield when fishing mortality Fmsy is applied. |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The SSB/MSYBtrigger ratio was used for the assessment of spawning stock biomass (SSB): the ratio of the estimated spawning stock biomass (SSB) to the minimum spawning biomass (MSYBtrigger), which ensures maximum sustainable yield when fishing mortality Fmsy is applied. |
||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
|||||
Description element |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reporting method feature |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
|||
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
|||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
|||
Description overall status |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Test TV |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_32
Regional assessment area |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
||
Element extent |
||||||||
Trend element |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|||||
Element 2 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
Baltic Herring (Clupea harengus membras) in Subdivision 25–27, 28.2, 29 & 32 |
||
Element source |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
CFP;EU |
|||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Not assessed
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework (DC-MAP)
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
1.76 |
0.52 |
1.76 |
0.515 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
||||
Trend parameter |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Not assessed |
|||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
|||
Description parameter |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The SSB/MSYBtrigger ratio was used for the assessment of spawning stock biomass (SSB): the ratio of the estimated spawning stock biomass (SSB) to the minimum spawning biomass (MSYBtrigger), which ensures maximum sustainable yield when fishing mortality Fmsy is applied. |
The ratio of realized fishing mortality (F) to the fishing mortality that ensures the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (F/Fmsy) |
The SSB/MSYBtrigger ratio was used for the assessment of spawning stock biomass (SSB): the ratio of the estimated spawning stock biomass (SSB) to the minimum spawning biomass (MSYBtrigger), which ensures maximum sustainable yield when fishing mortality Fmsy is applied. |
||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
|||||
Description element |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
assessment based on D3C1 and D3C2; D3C3 not assessed |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reporting method feature |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
|||
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
|||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
|||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
|||
Description overall status |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
The criterion D3C3 was not assessed for Clupea harengus membras because: 1) as short-lived species, their population status is not primarily indicated by changes in age and size structure; 2) age and size data are already included in population models for fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2) assessments; and 3) threshold values have not been established yet. |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Test TV |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |